Επειδή ο κ. Κουμουτσάκος χρησιμοποίησε πάλι σήμερα τον όρο «κράτος-παρίας» για τη γείτονα χώρα, ας δούμε τους ορισμούς που αιτιολογούν τη χρήση:
The second type of definitions is most simply exemplified by Weiss's definition, according to which pariah states are "states that violate international norms."[Weiss, Ari B. (2012). Revolutionary Identities and Competing Legitimacies: Why Pariah States Export Violence (Thesis)] Similarly, Harkavy offers, "A Pariah State is one whose conduct is considered to be out of line with international norms of behavior."[Harkavy, Robert (1981). "Pariah states and nuclear proliferation". International Organization. Cambridge University Press.] Geldenhuys gives a more detailed definition of that type: "A pariah (or outcast) country is one whose domestic or international behaviour seriously offends the world community or at least a significant group of states."[Geldenhuys, Deon (March 5, 1997). "PARIAH STATES IN THE POST-COLD WAR WORLD: A CONCEPTUAL EXPLORATION"
(PDF). SAIIA Reports (2)] Marks's definition elaborates more: a pariah state is "a state with provocative policies or expansionary territorial ambitions, measures of the absence of diplomatic relations with neighboring states or the situational harm posed to other states if the state in question acquired nuclear weapons."[Michael P. Marks (2011). Metaphors in International Relations Theory. Palgrave Macmillan]
Note: Lawal acknowledges in his paper that there is a great deal of overlap between the definitions of "pariah states" and "rogue states".
en.wikipedia.org
