Από το ίδιο
γλωσσάρι:
haecceity [Latin for ‘thisness’]: a term taken from the medieval philosopher Duns Scotus to denote a ‘nonpersonal individuation’ of either a body or an environmental assemblage, a block of space-time (260-5). The concept of haecceity enables DG to write about the uniqueness of things or events without resorting to the traditional Aristotelian genus/species/individual scheme, which Deleuze rejects as subordinating difference to a horizon of identity (for example, DR: 30-5). In ATP, a body taken as a haecceity is defined in its cartography by its longitude (the ‘speeds and slowness’ of its material flows) and by its latitude (its set of affects) (260-1). An environmental assemblage, a ‘set of relations’ defined as a haecceity (382), treats spatio-temporal relations not as predicates of a thing (Aristotle’s categories include ‘where’ and ‘when’) but as dimensions of multiplicities, components of the assemblage (262). The semiotic of haecceities links indefinite article + proper name + infinitive verb (263-5). The indefinite article indicates that elements find their individuation in the assemblage, not from their form or subjectivity. The proper name, as in military naming of an operation or meteorological naming of a storm, indicates the event-character of the assemblage. The infinitive verb, ‘Aion’, expresses the time proper to the virtual realm.
Είχαμε κάπου αλλού συμφωνήσει ότι η
αυτότητα δεν θα ήταν άσχημη απόδοση.